Inglourious Basterds: Once Upon a Time in Nazi Occupied France

Inglourious Basterds, entirely apart from having a title that’s painful to type, entirely separate from the not-entirely-favourable reception it had at Cannes, is Quentin Tarantino’s latest movie.

I’m too young to really remember him being cinema’s enfant terrible, and I recall being sent upstairs by my aunt while she and my brother watched Reservoir Dogs – unfortunately, the TV was at the bottom of the stairs so I could hear every damn word she was protecting me from – but I know his work, if not overly well.

I realise that it’s becoming a sort of recurring motif for me, labelling things as “not movies” … but Tarantino doesn’t so much make “not movies” as he does “genre movies” – films in bold and italics. They’re more movie than movie.

Tarantino is in the business of making replicants, is what I’m saying.

I saw this trailer for it at Bruno, and immediately afterwards my occasional comrade said “that looks shit”. But it doesn’t to my eyes. It looks somewhat splendid, and I say that as someone who thought that Death Proof was self-indulgent clap trap only partly redeemed by a great ending. As Tony said to Dittman, “it’s Tarantino, man!”

There don’t seem to have been a lot of World War II movies out of America lately, particularly not ones that have dealt with Nazi fighting adventures.  Spike Lee had his, which never saw release here and, in the interest of academic honesty, I can’t be bothered looking up the name of it. The other was Bryan Singer’s Valkyrie, which dared to answer the question “how do you make an assassination plot against Hitler boring?”

Inglourious Basterds, on the other hand, is unambiguous: it’s about the olden days when people were allowed to kill Nazis on film and do so in elaborate and bloody ways. What’s so bad about that? It looks fun, and it looks like once again Tarantino has indulged his love for film. Some may say that Kill Bill Volume 2 was better than the first, but what I most remember about it was that the credits doubled as the credits for Volume 1, and reminded me of how much fun I had the day I saw it.

Inglourious Basterds features everything that anyone could ever ask of this type of movie: Brad Pitt shooting Nazis, and at least a little bit of participation from Samuel L. Jackson. What could possibly go wrong? This is me setting up a hubristic goal: I am going to see Inglourious Basterds and I am going to enjoy it. 2009 has been so disappointing and underwhelming so far that it has to deliver.

It should also be noted that the trailer I’ve posted above is slightly different to the one I saw, but largely the same, and totally different to the most widely available trailer which makes the movie look boring as all get out. I know that some – my father, for one –  think that one shouldn’t treat Nazi Germany as a simple matter of gung ho guns, render it a “boy’s own” adventure, but I think that, as long as we don’t try to deny it, it’s right to try to get as much out of the experience as we can. By rendering Hitler ridiculous – and there’s no one better at that than Mel Brooks – we disrespect not the memories of those who died in the war, but those of Hitler himself.

Please don’t disappoint me again, Mister Tarantino: I know you have the power, through this movie, to save my American summer.

This entry was posted in Film, Trailers. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Inglourious Basterds: Once Upon a Time in Nazi Occupied France

  1. Wavatar Mark says:

    The past few Tarantino movies have distinctly underwhelmed me when I first heard about them, and IB is no different in that respect. However, I loved Kill Bill (both parts) and even Death Proof (indulgence and all), so I’m really not sure what to expect out of IB. Will he once again defy expecations? Or am I expecting him to defy expectations, and thus expecting too much? Time will tell, I suppose.

  2. Wavatar Alex says:

    I think that Tarantino’s big thing is genre films. I even liked Sukiyaki Western Django, despite the print I watched being desperately in need of subtitles (I’m connecting him to that because he was in it, speaking really bad English, and saying “even in the end, I am an anime otaku” and the response being “what?”).

    I liked Death Proof enough to buy the DVD but I’m not sure I like it enough to watch it again. I own all of his movies but I’ve only seen each of them once. He’s a man who is so sure of himself, so confident and so outspoken about his films, that it’s hard to extricate the film from the man himself – especially when he labels IB his “masterpiece”, and when he said that Death Proof had awesome dialogue (it really didn’t).

    Anyway, we should probably be honour bound to compare notes at release. I’m trying to be more consistent and put stuff out there, so let’s set a goal and either enjoy or tear apart this film!

  3. Wavatar Mark says:

    You know, I’ve always hated Tarantino movie DVD releases. Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction have decent releases, but Kill Bill discs are devoid of extras. And for some reason, Tarantino never does commentaries for his own films (but he does lots of other ones for other people’s films, apparently). I refuse to buy Death Proof until they release the entire Grindhouse package as God intended (i.e. the full 3 hour experience with trailers, etc…).

    Ok, goal set. Share thoughts on IB when it comes out. Looking forward to it…

  4. Wavatar Curtis says:

    This looks awesome.

    Who doesn’t love killin’ Nazis?

  5. Wavatar Alex says:

    Certainly not Angela Lansbury!

    I think it’s also worth noting that this has cast Mike Myers in his first not crap movie for the longest time.

  6. Wavatar Leonardo says:

    The video was good (one they actually stterad talking about anything), but I do believe they are misinformed. Tarantino has admitted that Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, True Romance, and even Natural Born Killers, are all SUPPOSE to take place in the same universe. His movie universe. However, he’s stated that all his over the top movies (From Dusk Till Dawn, Kill Bill, Death Proof) all take place in another universe. A movie-movie universe. He described it as the movie-movie movies are all movies that people in the movie universe would go and watch and talk about. So as much as even I want to believe it, the organ player is not Jules.ps- They were right about Jackie Brown though. That is in it’s own thing. I don’t know where Basterds will fall.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word